Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Tech & Fab
Antisquat % differences???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the_white_shadow" data-source="post: 618504" data-attributes="member: 10112"><p>Bumping this back to the top for some comments. Im working on my front suspension design for my truck and have the front anti-dive (braking) around 30% at ride height. This isnt going to be a racecar just a trail rig. Roll axis is at -0.22 degrees. Pinion change is about +5* during bump travel and -2.2* at droop. All of my other numbers look good except the AS number. Whats the consensus on lower v.s higher AS numbers? Whats a good number to shoot for for the front? Rear? </p><p></p><p>Dual triangulated front with 40" lowers and 34" uppers. 9" Vertical separation at axle and 7" at frame. Flat to slightly negative lowers at ride height. 42" tires. </p><p></p><p>Side question: When using the calculator what does everyone put in for the CoG value? Typical buggy style chassis with 8" deep subframe. Engine is stuffed back and low. This value affects the outputs in the spreadsheet greatly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the_white_shadow, post: 618504, member: 10112"] Bumping this back to the top for some comments. Im working on my front suspension design for my truck and have the front anti-dive (braking) around 30% at ride height. This isnt going to be a racecar just a trail rig. Roll axis is at -0.22 degrees. Pinion change is about +5* during bump travel and -2.2* at droop. All of my other numbers look good except the AS number. Whats the consensus on lower v.s higher AS numbers? Whats a good number to shoot for for the front? Rear? Dual triangulated front with 40" lowers and 34" uppers. 9" Vertical separation at axle and 7" at frame. Flat to slightly negative lowers at ride height. 42" tires. Side question: When using the calculator what does everyone put in for the CoG value? Typical buggy style chassis with 8" deep subframe. Engine is stuffed back and low. This value affects the outputs in the spreadsheet greatly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
Family Truckster LJ build
Latest: ridered3
Thursday at 5:37 PM
Tech & Fab
M
For Sale
1973 FJ40
Latest: MNboy
Thursday at 3:26 PM
Vehicles For Sale
C
For Sale
1978 J10 Golden Eagle on 43's
Latest: CarolinaCrawler1
Wednesday at 10:24 PM
Vehicles For Sale
For Sale
Single Seat Ultra4 Car
Latest: ridered3
Tuesday at 11:56 AM
Vehicles For Sale
XRock
Latest: ridered3
Jun 10, 2024
Trail Rides & Competitions
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Tech & Fab
Antisquat % differences???
Top