Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
IBP's versus Bypasses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mac5005" data-source="post: 739694" data-attributes="member: 4650"><p>Late to the party here. </p><p></p><p>For most things 2.5s are better than 2.0's. When your sprung mass starts to become equal to unsprung mass, 2.5's can be problematic to tune and get a decent ride quality. </p><p></p><p> Not impossible, but that setup sucks to tune either way. </p><p></p><p>The initial crack pressure of getting the 2.5 shim stack to move vs getting the 2.0 stack to move, before it knocks your teeth out in the seat. </p><p></p><p>2.5s typically have some features that make working on them easier than 2.0's. How the coil hardware comes on/off, how the misalignments go into the uniballs, and also generally have better pistons than 2.0's. </p><p></p><p>Adding resi's to emulsions is a night and day difference coupled with a decent tune. </p><p></p><p>It takes a big change in valving to get the DSC to function well. You can get them to work better, but it takes a lot of time on the compression stack on the piston before you start to feel noticeable differences in the seat with dsc's. </p><p></p><p>They can be beneficial but that's a lot to spend for what you get. Spend not much more and you could just about be into a coil carrier/bypass setup. </p><p></p><p>Internal bypass are neat, can be more difficult to tune than others, depending on which ones they are. I wouldn't spend money on them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mac5005, post: 739694, member: 4650"] Late to the party here. For most things 2.5s are better than 2.0’s. When your sprung mass starts to become equal to unsprung mass, 2.5’s can be problematic to tune and get a decent ride quality. Not impossible, but that setup sucks to tune either way. The initial crack pressure of getting the 2.5 shim stack to move vs getting the 2.0 stack to move, before it knocks your teeth out in the seat. 2.5s typically have some features that make working on them easier than 2.0’s. How the coil hardware comes on/off, how the misalignments go into the uniballs, and also generally have better pistons than 2.0’s. Adding resi’s to emulsions is a night and day difference coupled with a decent tune. It takes a big change in valving to get the DSC to function well. You can get them to work better, but it takes a lot of time on the compression stack on the piston before you start to feel noticeable differences in the seat with dsc’s. They can be beneficial but that’s a lot to spend for what you get. Spend not much more and you could just about be into a coil carrier/bypass setup. Internal bypass are neat, can be more difficult to tune than others, depending on which ones they are. I wouldn’t spend money on them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
Cash LeCroy Illness
Latest: ridered3
42 minutes ago
General Discussion
Hollar wood offroad park next weekend
Latest: baldduck74
46 minutes ago
General Discussion
Official "Post your trail riding pics" Thread
Latest: baldduck74
49 minutes ago
General Discussion
Coalmont TN OHV New Park info
Latest: ridered3
Yesterday at 3:48 PM
General Discussion
Trying to get it mostly right the first time: A 5.9 Magnum and 46RE swapped, Tummy Tucked Daily Driven Jeep TJ
Latest: ridered3
Thursday at 10:08 AM
Tech & Fab
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
IBP's versus Bypasses
Top