Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
Weapons of war
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightBnDr" data-source="post: 702394" data-attributes="member: 9031"><p>I disagree a bit about being against carrying teachers. </p><p></p><p>I think that some really great training can be had for teachers who want to carry. I would even stress that it be a requirement. In my opinion a well armed, in terms of a fire arm that fits and is practiced with, teacher is a great weapon against deterring an attack in a school. Especially if you have multiple members who carry in different areas of the school. </p><p></p><p>Going back to the training aspect, some good friends and I have trained hard with an Israeli combat instructor. We worked on dealing with start to finish the threats of an active shooter. Multiple scenarios. Whether it be at Disney Land, Starbucks, the mall, a school. Just to name a few. </p><p></p><p>It was one of the most eye opening training sessions I have ever experienced. Walked away feeling that every single American should experience it. The threat is real today. It can come from any direction, zero warning. </p><p></p><p>So basically I'm saying that even a moderately trained but passionate teacher who has minimum active shooter training can be MUCH more effective across the board to cope with an attack from deterring it all the way to stopping it.</p><p></p><p>The second that we say "Please gov we need a group of trained law enforcement surrounding us and searching us" is the second we give up more of our rights and responsibilities to protect ourselves and others. </p><p></p><p>It would blow your mind how effective active shooter training is for the average American. It can truly weed out the guy or gal who wants to carry an LCP in his skinny jeans and never fire it then finely hone the guy or gal that carries a CZ subcompact and practices weekly. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Point being this movement is about disarming the public, creating more reliance of government to take care of us. To shape and mold a new generation of people who are worthless. It sucks and I will never advocate for Americans not to carry versus a squad of heavily armed government employees. </p><p></p><p>Our best weapon is education on how to deal with an attack, step two is whether you are willing to and can stop it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightBnDr, post: 702394, member: 9031"] I disagree a bit about being against carrying teachers. I think that some really great training can be had for teachers who want to carry. I would even stress that it be a requirement. In my opinion a well armed, in terms of a fire arm that fits and is practiced with, teacher is a great weapon against deterring an attack in a school. Especially if you have multiple members who carry in different areas of the school. Going back to the training aspect, some good friends and I have trained hard with an Israeli combat instructor. We worked on dealing with start to finish the threats of an active shooter. Multiple scenarios. Whether it be at Disney Land, Starbucks, the mall, a school. Just to name a few. It was one of the most eye opening training sessions I have ever experienced. Walked away feeling that every single American should experience it. The threat is real today. It can come from any direction, zero warning. So basically I'm saying that even a moderately trained but passionate teacher who has minimum active shooter training can be MUCH more effective across the board to cope with an attack from deterring it all the way to stopping it. The second that we say "Please gov we need a group of trained law enforcement surrounding us and searching us" is the second we give up more of our rights and responsibilities to protect ourselves and others. It would blow your mind how effective active shooter training is for the average American. It can truly weed out the guy or gal who wants to carry an LCP in his skinny jeans and never fire it then finely hone the guy or gal that carries a CZ subcompact and practices weekly. Point being this movement is about disarming the public, creating more reliance of government to take care of us. To shape and mold a new generation of people who are worthless. It sucks and I will never advocate for Americans not to carry versus a squad of heavily armed government employees. Our best weapon is education on how to deal with an attack, step two is whether you are willing to and can stop it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
Family Truckster LJ build
Latest: ridered3
Thursday at 5:37 PM
Tech & Fab
M
For Sale
1973 FJ40
Latest: MNboy
Thursday at 3:26 PM
Vehicles For Sale
C
For Sale
1978 J10 Golden Eagle on 43's
Latest: CarolinaCrawler1
Wednesday at 10:24 PM
Vehicles For Sale
For Sale
Single Seat Ultra4 Car
Latest: ridered3
Tuesday at 11:56 AM
Vehicles For Sale
XRock
Latest: ridered3
Monday at 10:38 PM
Trail Rides & Competitions
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
Weapons of war
Top