CrustyJeep
Well-Known Member
Not if you use a number base that's divisible by 3 :flipoff:mathematically impossible to be 1/3 anything :flipoff:
Not if you use a number base that's divisible by 3 :flipoff:mathematically impossible to be 1/3 anything :flipoff:
I am 1/3 sure he doesn't care. :redneck:
Not if you use a number base that's divisible by 3 :flipoff:
Sure it is. 2 can be divided by 3 just fine. :D When did this become a math thread?I'm pretty sure 2 isn't.
Sure it is. 2 can be divided by 3 just fine. :D When did this become a math thread?
Well I'm pretty sure you're wrong.I'm pretty sure 2 isn't.
mathematically impossible to be 1/3 anything :flipoff:
Wentz was saying that a person cannot be 1/3 of anything racially... because we don't have 3 parents. Only 2, so everything ends up in multiples of 1/2... you can be 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 3/8, etc... but not 1/3.Well I'm pretty sure you're wrong.
And it isn't mathematically impossible, it just physically impossible to express an infinite number of repeating decimal places. Base 3 numbering wouldn't have the same problem with 1/3. It would just have it with 1/2 :flipoff:
That would be 21/64, 21/64, and 11/32... not 1/3. :cool:Actually, it's quite possible.
Go back to when you had 64 great-great-great-grandparents.
21 of them are Martians
21 of them are Venutians
22 of them are Earthlings.
Mathamatically, it's insignificant from your numbers.
Oh. That. Darn it :rasta:Wentz was saying that a person cannot be 1/3 of anything racially... because we don't have 3 parents. Only 2, so everything ends up in multiples of 1/2... you can be 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 3/8, etc... but not 1/3.
Without an infinite number of generations, at least... but infinite series are another story entirely.
Well I'm pretty sure you're wrong.
And it isn't mathematically impossible, it just physically impossible to express an infinite number of repeating decimal places. Base 3 numbering wouldn't have the same problem with 1/3. It would just have it with 1/2 :flipoff:
I added european as thats my background.
That's in the "Cultural Demographic" thread.Where's the option for being a red blooded proud American?
mathematically impossible to be 1/3 anything :flipoff:
Still 1 sperm, 1 ovum. :fawkdancesmiley:Not unless your mother was participating in a threesome at the time of your conception. :awesomework:
Still 1 sperm, 1 ovum. :fawkdancesmiley:
I thought maybe you were onto something, but Google says no. In the rare event that two sperm fuse with one egg, or in the even rarer event that two sperm from two different men fuse with one egg, the result is "semi-identical twins".Not unless your mother was participating in a threesome at the time of your conception. :awesomework:
Kick you mom in the ****?What do you check if both of your parents are white, but you came out black?:scratchhead:
I thought maybe you were onto something, but Google says no. In the rare event that two sperm fuse with one egg, or in the even rarer event that two sperm from two different men fuse with one egg, the result is "semi-identical twins".
1/4 alaskan native. 1/4 scott, 1/2 irish.
No, apparently the embryo always splits when this happens. The result is semi-identical twins that share only the mother's DNA.hmmm, interesting.:eeek:
EDIT: But wait! so it can happen that two sperm can inseminate a single egg, correct?! So for example, a full blood black and a full blood indian, can inseminate one egg of a full blood asian and have a mix of 3 then, correct?! or am I off on my NWW Theory?! :redneck:
Aye... it is not possible for the embryo to have DNA made up from more than two people. The DNA just doesn't combine like that...No, apparently the embryo always splits when this happens. The result is semi-identical twins that share only the mother's DNA.
You'd get a Black/Asian mix and an Indian/Asian mix.
What do you check if both of your parents are white, but you came out black?:scratchhead:
Honky.I'm actually a web wheelin american, ya bunch o haters:redneck: