Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
2 ****ed up stories
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="InDaShop" data-source="post: 279707" data-attributes="member: 1295"><p>JJ, you are retelling the Warren v. District of Columbia case. Its probably the most qouted case for the police have no obligation to protect individuals. </p><p></p><p><strong><em>Warren v. District of Columbia is one of the leading cases of this type. Two women were upstairs in a townhouse when they heard their roommate, a third woman, being attacked downstairs by intruders. They phoned the police several times and were assured that officers were on the way. After about 30 minutes, when their roommate's screams had stopped, they assumed the police had finally arrived. When the two women went downstairs they saw that in fact the police never came, but the intruders were still there. As the Warren court graphically states in the opinion: "For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of their attackers." </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them, but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that it is a "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [4] There are many similar cases with results to the same effect. [5] </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong></p><p><strong><em>In the Warren case the injured parties sued the District of Columbia under its own laws for failing to protect them. Most often such cases are brought in state (or, in the case of Warren, D.C.) courts for violation of state statutes, because federal law pertaining to these matters is even more onerous. But when someone does sue under federal law, it is nearly always for violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983 (often inaccurately referred to as "the civil rights act"). Section 1983 claims are brought against government officials for allegedly violating the injured parties' federal statutory or Constitutional rights. </em> </strong> </p><p></p><p>Old story or new story, it all still holds the same weight. There are bad people out there, and that # is increasing daily. If you expect to fight for life, even if it s just walking down the street or running an errand at the grocery store that next breath you take is not a god given right, you are fight ing for every single breath you take. Sometimes its a much harder fight. So who would you like doing that fighting? Yourself because it means life or death or the police that you dont know and has no interest in your implicit next breath?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="InDaShop, post: 279707, member: 1295"] JJ, you are retelling the Warren v. District of Columbia case. Its probably the most qouted case for the police have no obligation to protect individuals. [b][i]Warren v. District of Columbia is one of the leading cases of this type. Two women were upstairs in a townhouse when they heard their roommate, a third woman, being attacked downstairs by intruders. They phoned the police several times and were assured that officers were on the way. After about 30 minutes, when their roommate's screams had stopped, they assumed the police had finally arrived. When the two women went downstairs they saw that in fact the police never came, but the intruders were still there. As the Warren court graphically states in the opinion: "For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of their attackers." The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them, but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that it is a "fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen." [4] There are many similar cases with results to the same effect. [5] In the Warren case the injured parties sued the District of Columbia under its own laws for failing to protect them. Most often such cases are brought in state (or, in the case of Warren, D.C.) courts for violation of state statutes, because federal law pertaining to these matters is even more onerous. But when someone does sue under federal law, it is nearly always for violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983 (often inaccurately referred to as "the civil rights act"). Section 1983 claims are brought against government officials for allegedly violating the injured parties' federal statutory or Constitutional rights. [/i] [/b] Old story or new story, it all still holds the same weight. There are bad people out there, and that # is increasing daily. If you expect to fight for life, even if it s just walking down the street or running an errand at the grocery store that next breath you take is not a god given right, you are fight ing for every single breath you take. Sometimes its a much harder fight. So who would you like doing that fighting? Yourself because it means life or death or the police that you dont know and has no interest in your implicit next breath? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
Coalmont TN OHV New Park info
Latest: ridered3
42 minutes ago
General Discussion
B
Official "Post your trail riding pics" Thread
Latest: broncoparts
Today at 1:35 PM
General Discussion
Trying to get it mostly right the first time: A 5.9 Magnum and 46RE swapped, Tummy Tucked Daily Driven Jeep TJ
Latest: ridered3
Yesterday at 10:08 AM
Tech & Fab
2.5 ton rockwell pattern wheels
Latest: semperfi1919
Wednesday at 7:38 PM
Wanted to Buy
T
For Sale
85-91 Ford Kingpin Dana 60 $2k
Latest: truck-oholic
Tuesday at 4:29 PM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
2 ****ed up stories
Top