Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
54" Boggers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CHOP SHOP" data-source="post: 1123892" data-attributes="member: 17493"><p>those were the first set sold in washington, they were installed at my shop side by side with a 16.00 and they were smaller. they were ugly they look half worn out when new.:booo: </p><p></p><p>this is what gets me. the thread was abou the new bogger not 49s, 47s, 16.00s/53s. but now folks are comparing them to others. </p><p></p><p>as a comp tire they suck, hands down suck. not even close to a 44 bogger. its treads are half as tall as a 44 bogger, its heavier, it doesnt even have scooped lugs. IMO garbage for mud drags.</p><p></p><p>as a show tire, which is what they were produced for (indy jambo ring a bell?), they suck. they are ugly, they look like a beach ball with lugs vulcanized on them, puffy looking like a 49 iroc. the lugs look like they stole them off of a 32 bogger<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite11" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll Eyes :rolleyes:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":rolleyes:" /> and they dont even measure what the sidewall says, liars:eeek: . they are very expensive too. </p><p></p><p>a show truck has to look good and be big, if you like the bogger and have a ton of loot, then go for it.:awesomework: but if a worthless truck needs worthless tires, id go for the cheaper "worthless".:awesomework:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CHOP SHOP, post: 1123892, member: 17493"] those were the first set sold in washington, they were installed at my shop side by side with a 16.00 and they were smaller. they were ugly they look half worn out when new.:booo: this is what gets me. the thread was abou the new bogger not 49s, 47s, 16.00s/53s. but now folks are comparing them to others. as a comp tire they suck, hands down suck. not even close to a 44 bogger. its treads are half as tall as a 44 bogger, its heavier, it doesnt even have scooped lugs. IMO garbage for mud drags. as a show tire, which is what they were produced for (indy jambo ring a bell?), they suck. they are ugly, they look like a beach ball with lugs vulcanized on them, puffy looking like a 49 iroc. the lugs look like they stole them off of a 32 bogger:rolleyes: and they dont even measure what the sidewall says, liars:eeek: . they are very expensive too. a show truck has to look good and be big, if you like the bogger and have a ton of loot, then go for it.:awesomework: but if a worthless truck needs worthless tires, id go for the cheaper "worthless".:awesomework: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
Meet Christine Reborn, my trail bouncer build
Latest: ridered3
Yesterday at 10:44 PM
Tech & Fab
Golden Mountain Off-road Park opening
Latest: ridered3
Yesterday at 10:40 PM
General Discussion
W
3800 sc and 60*bellhousing 700r4
Latest: wrenchbender
Yesterday at 7:36 PM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
For Sale
1999 Jeep Cherokee
Latest: Big David
Yesterday at 3:56 PM
Vehicles For Sale
For Sale
Jimmy Smith Rockbouncer 383 Stroker
Latest: ToledoDan
Yesterday at 3:49 PM
Vehicles For Sale
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
54" Boggers
Top