Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Tech & Fab
90's throw back....Manche build
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mcutler" data-source="post: 622351" data-attributes="member: 1641"><p><strong>Re: Re: 90's throw back....Manche build</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks jp</p><p></p><p>Thanks</p><p></p><p>From nc4x4;</p><p></p><p>[quote uid=1339 name="SPOA87YJ" post=1480069]Nice work going on here. Working in the measurement industry.....what does that arm weigh?! Just curious.</p></blockquote><p>Here ya go! </p><p></p><p>40" eye to eye. Roughly 33" of 2"x250. less than 1 sqft of 3/16 cr. Roughly 2 sqft 1/8 cr. All p&o.</p><p></p><p>Lighter than I imagined frankly, @ 33.6.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161012/3591f1e57e7c1d97fdbb324e4c0eef3e.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a spare front link, 29.5" jamb to jamb of 2"x250, @ 17.6. And if I recollect, my 2" 7075 links that I put on the buggy to replace these were just a pound or two less. </p><p></p><p><img src="http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161012/f06ebeb62e099d881b2a4801e177a9e9.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>So overall, roughly a 35 lb gain over simply running 2"x250 dom links for the rear lowers. Since my uppers are only going to be 1.75x120 versus the 2" as previously on the buggy, I'd say it's a wash on the rear. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Matt</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="mcutler, post: 622351, member: 1641"] [b]Re: Re: 90's throw back....Manche build[/b] Thanks jp Thanks From nc4x4; [quote uid=1339 name="SPOA87YJ" post=1480069]Nice work going on here. Working in the measurement industry.....what does that arm weigh?! Just curious.[/QUOTE] Here ya go! 40" eye to eye. Roughly 33" of 2"x250. less than 1 sqft of 3/16 cr. Roughly 2 sqft 1/8 cr. All p&o. Lighter than I imagined frankly, @ 33.6. [IMG]http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161012/3591f1e57e7c1d97fdbb324e4c0eef3e.jpg[/IMG] This is a spare front link, 29.5" jamb to jamb of 2"x250, @ 17.6. And if I recollect, my 2" 7075 links that I put on the buggy to replace these were just a pound or two less. [IMG]http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161012/f06ebeb62e099d881b2a4801e177a9e9.jpg[/IMG] So overall, roughly a 35 lb gain over simply running 2"x250 dom links for the rear lowers. Since my uppers are only going to be 1.75x120 versus the 2" as previously on the buggy, I'd say it's a wash on the rear. Matt [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
B
For Sale
98' XJ, absolute unit, $17,500
Latest: BigO66
17 minutes ago
Vehicles For Sale
2-2.5 ton Rockwell’s new in crates
Latest: Piros 1
Saturday at 2:42 AM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
For Sale
Jeep TJ tube buggy for sale $32,000.00
Latest: Piros 1
Saturday at 2:41 AM
Vehicles For Sale
T
For Sale
85-91 Ford Kingpin Dana 60 $2k
Latest: truck-oholic
Friday at 3:58 PM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
Pluging holes
Latest: baldduck74
Wednesday at 3:56 PM
General Discussion
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Tech & Fab
90's throw back....Manche build
Top