Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Tech & Fab
Bypass reservoir relocate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mac5005" data-source="post: 690492" data-attributes="member: 4650"><p><strong>Bypass reservoir relocate</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Are you going to be racing or trail riding? </p><p></p><p>Even if rock bouncing, I doubt you have a long enough run to notice considerable fade and cooking the oil to need reservoirs on the bypasses. The same is true for the coil carriers. </p><p></p><p>The coilovers valving should be low and only sets the valving during the center of the bypass travel. This is why most people run no valving in the coil carrier to start with and only add it if necessary once the bypass is tuned. </p><p></p><p>If you are just trail riding, I doubt you would ever actually need the benefit of the remote reservoirs on the bypasses. </p><p></p><p>Emulsion shocks under hard use (racing) offer less consistent valving than reservoir shocks with an ifp. Under extreme events the emulsion of oil and n2 can erode the piston surfaces in the ports, but if not ultra4 type stuff, I doubt that would ever happen. </p><p></p><p>I€™m not entire convinced it would even happen rockbouncing, where the runs aren€™t long enough to get the shocks oil over temp. I€™m not argueing that reservoir shocks aren€™t better, just pointing out that you may never notice the difference based on intended usage. </p><p></p><p>I€™d just run and tune and tune and tune what you have and see how it works.</p><p></p><p>Just to clarify for the thread, the coilovers are speed sensitive and the bypasses are position sensitive. This is what allows their use to tune in two completely different ways to achieve the same goal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mac5005, post: 690492, member: 4650"] [b]Bypass reservoir relocate[/b] Are you going to be racing or trail riding? Even if rock bouncing, I doubt you have a long enough run to notice considerable fade and cooking the oil to need reservoirs on the bypasses. The same is true for the coil carriers. The coilovers valving should be low and only sets the valving during the center of the bypass travel. This is why most people run no valving in the coil carrier to start with and only add it if necessary once the bypass is tuned. If you are just trail riding, I doubt you would ever actually need the benefit of the remote reservoirs on the bypasses. Emulsion shocks under hard use (racing) offer less consistent valving than reservoir shocks with an ifp. Under extreme events the emulsion of oil and n2 can erode the piston surfaces in the ports, but if not ultra4 type stuff, I doubt that would ever happen. I€™m not entire convinced it would even happen rockbouncing, where the runs aren€™t long enough to get the shocks oil over temp. I€™m not argueing that reservoir shocks aren€™t better, just pointing out that you may never notice the difference based on intended usage. I€™d just run and tune and tune and tune what you have and see how it works. Just to clarify for the thread, the coilovers are speed sensitive and the bypasses are position sensitive. This is what allows their use to tune in two completely different ways to achieve the same goal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
2.5 ton rockwell pattern wheels
Latest: semperfi1919
42 minutes ago
Wanted to Buy
T
For Sale
85-91 Ford Kingpin Dana 60 $2k
Latest: truck-oholic
Yesterday at 4:29 PM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
MMORV - SETTC - September 27-29,2013
Latest: felipecj
Yesterday at 1:29 PM
Trail Rides & Competitions
For Sale
38" MTR's on 17's
Latest: 83ChevyK5
Yesterday at 9:28 AM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
0
For Sale
1975 Jeep CJ5 Renegade
Latest: 01Truggy
Yesterday at 6:24 AM
Vehicles For Sale
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Tech & Fab
Bypass reservoir relocate
Top