Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
No More grey area if SB-5366 passes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tod" data-source="post: 1474152" data-attributes="member: 16887"><p>YIKES!!!</p><p></p><p>Pat totally misconstrued my input.</p><p>I was asked how to define an ATV versus all OHV.</p><p></p><p>What I told him was that ATV were typically under 1000 lb or less than 50 inches wide. I never recommended to exclude them. In fact I was one of the few that want at least side by sides included. Turns out WSP was going to go full out against the bill if it included anything similar to an automobile that did not meet the existing automobile safety standards. The people pushing 1203 wanted it to move forward so they misuse my words. Thank you fro bringing this to my attention.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I did not provide testimony on 1203 in 2011, but I did on the Senate equivalent, 5366 in 2011, see below:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Please vote YES on SB5366 (Authorizing the use of off-road vehicles on public roadways under certain conditions or in certain areas).</p><p></p><p>This bill would allow limited use of all-terrain vehicles on public roadways under certain conditions.</p><p></p><p>SB5366 is now before the House Transportation Committee.</p><p></p><p>It would allow limited use of ATV on certain roads with common sense safety equipment and liability insurance requirements. This would increase recreational opportunities without costing the State any money. With limited road access it would allow motorized trail users to connect trails that have been fragmented by road building and timber harvesting. It would also facilitate access to small rural towns where their visits help the local economy.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, people with limited mobility will benefit from this legislation.</p><p></p><p>Idaho allows similar road use and it has shown to be safe and a great benefit to recreationalists and the local communities.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tod, post: 1474152, member: 16887"] YIKES!!! Pat totally misconstrued my input. I was asked how to define an ATV versus all OHV. What I told him was that ATV were typically under 1000 lb or less than 50 inches wide. I never recommended to exclude them. In fact I was one of the few that want at least side by sides included. Turns out WSP was going to go full out against the bill if it included anything similar to an automobile that did not meet the existing automobile safety standards. The people pushing 1203 wanted it to move forward so they misuse my words. Thank you fro bringing this to my attention. I did not provide testimony on 1203 in 2011, but I did on the Senate equivalent, 5366 in 2011, see below: Please vote YES on SB5366 (Authorizing the use of off-road vehicles on public roadways under certain conditions or in certain areas). This bill would allow limited use of all-terrain vehicles on public roadways under certain conditions. SB5366 is now before the House Transportation Committee. It would allow limited use of ATV on certain roads with common sense safety equipment and liability insurance requirements. This would increase recreational opportunities without costing the State any money. With limited road access it would allow motorized trail users to connect trails that have been fragmented by road building and timber harvesting. It would also facilitate access to small rural towns where their visits help the local economy. Additionally, people with limited mobility will benefit from this legislation. Idaho allows similar road use and it has shown to be safe and a great benefit to recreationalists and the local communities. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
Pickett State Park/Blackhouse Mountian 1-23-2016
Latest: ridered3
Friday at 3:12 PM
Trail Rides & Competitions
Daves Offroad Supply
Latest: Daves Offroad Supply
Wednesday at 10:52 AM
Vendors
B
For Sale
Artec Back-bone truss for 14 bolt
Latest: Bebop
Tuesday at 7:19 PM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
P
YouTube of the day
Latest: paradisepwoffrd
Monday at 8:21 AM
General Discussion
Cash LeCroy Illness
Latest: ridered3
May 26, 2024
General Discussion
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
No More grey area if SB-5366 passes
Top