Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Tech & Fab
Pro's N Con's More HP then "needed"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="patooyee" data-source="post: 110307" data-attributes="member: 483"><p>I've also heard about and seen some dynos on the newer gen engines that indicate that the sacrifice of low-end power is no longer necessary to get the high-end power like it was on the older generation engines. In addition, newgen builders will tell you that large cams are not necessary to get these power numbers. I couldn't tell you the physics of why this is just that it is apparently a result of all of the revolutionary design architecture of the blocks / heads. You obviously know more about engine building than I ...</p><p></p><p>Not a lot of dyno machines measure before 3000rpm so dynos lower than that are few and far between. All I can say though is that in my research about the engines I saw several 600 peak hp dynos where it was 200 - 300 ft/lbs around 2000 rpm. That's some pretty serious torque that early.</p><p></p><p>J. J.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="patooyee, post: 110307, member: 483"] I've also heard about and seen some dynos on the newer gen engines that indicate that the sacrifice of low-end power is no longer necessary to get the high-end power like it was on the older generation engines. In addition, newgen builders will tell you that large cams are not necessary to get these power numbers. I couldn't tell you the physics of why this is just that it is apparently a result of all of the revolutionary design architecture of the blocks / heads. You obviously know more about engine building than I ... Not a lot of dyno machines measure before 3000rpm so dynos lower than that are few and far between. All I can say though is that in my research about the engines I saw several 600 peak hp dynos where it was 200 - 300 ft/lbs around 2000 rpm. That's some pretty serious torque that early. J. J. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
I am moving to Tennessee
Latest: Blackbeard
Yesterday at 4:06 PM
General Discussion
For Sale
2005 Ford Excursion Eddie Bauer
Latest: jeeptj99
Monday at 11:55 AM
Vehicles For Sale
I.w.i.w clampy
Latest: bobbedrunner99
Friday at 4:44 PM
Tech & Fab
Salvage 10
Latest: ridered3
Friday at 7:47 AM
Tech & Fab
Ultra4 - Battle in Bluegrass (Bowling Green, KY) East Series (4/19-4/20)
Latest: ridered3
Apr 25, 2024
Trail Rides & Competitions
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Tech & Fab
Pro's N Con's More HP then "needed"
Top