aw gee now you done hurt my feelers :booo: Do your own research on here you will find its at 82" :awesomework:
Negative.
aw gee now you done hurt my feelers :booo: Do your own research on here you will find its at 82" :awesomework:
This will not turn into "whats the width" ***** fest guys......
i have never seen any rules enforced at Elbe Hills:awesomework: I hate ***** fests too.
There are two sides:
1. If there is a width restriction written as a rule.
2. If so, If that rule is enforced to the point it is a concern of an ORV user.
If the rule is not enforced (apparently it is is not, if even it is a written rule) then someone that asks the question, "...can I go." should be answered YES.
I doubt anyone is as concerned with the technical aspect, as the enforcement issue.
And......I believe the OP question was with regards to physical limitations.......not rules specifically.:;
This will not turn into "whats the width" ***** fest guys......
Can somebody contact nancy and get the words from her mouth on this subject?
If you don't like a few dents then busy isn't for you...
Can somebody contact nancy and get the words from her mouth on this subject?
Now here is something to think about ecspecialy if your building a rig right now. Many peopel complaine endlessly of all the rules and restrictions at Walker, Tahuya and now Reiter well get ready because we will be doing a forest plan for Elbe in the very near future and guess what ..... There will be rules put in place in writting and posted just like any other government facility.
people actually followed her home from the orv park.
If the OP's friend is as wide as described......looks like he shouldn't go.
Does anyone agree with this?
I just did.
There are no width restrictions at Elbe.
I would hope that the DNR realizes that wider vehicles are more stable and safe offroad and on sidehills then say a narrow tracked vehicle.
This can be easily demonstrated for the DNR officials if the need arises.
That was me.![]()
On a side note, maybe everyone that is over width should just simply foot the bill to build wider bridges then all of this width stuff would go away :;
Really? This is a realistic option? Pay to be over 82"?
Anyone else agree with this?
Really? This is a realistic option? Pay to be over 82"?
Anyone else agree with this?
\I would hope that the DNR realizes that wider vehicles are more stable and safe offroad and on sidehills then say a narrow tracked vehicle.
This can be easily demonstrated for the DNR officials if the need arises.
The DNR will take donations, I even have a form that can be filled out so the money can only be spent where you specify:awesomework:
After their donation is given, does this person receive a free pass to drive their "over-82-inches" rig over the 82" bridges?
A question for the folks who do the regular bridge repair and trail maintenance: ( This is all hypothetical of course. ) With these wider rigs now paying for their impact on the many bridges at Elbe, are you ok with that?
For someone that will never wheel elbe you sure are showing alot of interest in the place.
After their donation is given, does this person receive a free pass to drive their "over-82-inches" rig over the 82" bridges?
A question for the folks who do the regular bridge repair and trail maintenance: ( This is all hypothetical of course. ) With these wider rigs now paying for their impact on the many bridges at Elbe, are you ok with that?