Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Trail Rides & Competitions
GAP - Dirt Riot Race Round 1 - February 23, 2013
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BMan" data-source="post: 285974" data-attributes="member: 732"><p>Rich Kudo's to you and how things were ran! It's refreshing to see how you worked with us, gained our input and feedback to improve things and involved racers when a challenge was made. My perception is you take the attitude that the racers make a series and not the other way around! Due to the rain I don't think turnout was as good as it could of been! I think the "sissy's" stayed at home! LOL! I bet the next race will be a better turn out! </p><p></p><p>Oh and my apologize I don't think I ever offered you any of the home brew the wife makes. I'll make sure I do next time! <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies2/drinkinbuddies.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":drinkers:" title="Drinkinbuddies :drinkers:" data-shortname=":drinkers:" /></p><p></p><p>----------------------------</p><p></p><p>Bobby I was one of the 3 racers on the CRB along with another racer whose name escapes me right now and Roger King as you know since he came and talked to you as you were about to leave. The CRB was aware of what the placing changes would be before we started the process however we had no input or say in them or having them changed. I don't disagree with you on the statement both you and Jeff from Allsouth should have been given 2nd place. That wasn't are call though. We were to decide if under the circumstances what the racer did was warrant of a DQ or not. The Ultra 4 rules I reviewed are pretty black and white and it was stated at the driver meeting it was a no chase race. The racer was not recovered by his own crew. Complexity and gray area was introduced pertaining to the radio communication that took place. This communication lead the recovery team to believe not only pulling him off the track was OK but back to the pits was also OK. The CRB's impression was the radio miscommunication was the root cause of the misunderstanding and lead to the outcome. The recovery crew seeming to have an authoritative answer and also being the authoritative body at the scene of the issue acted accordingly. If the racer would of been advised differently he could have fixed his issue right there at the scene since it was any easy fix that took minimal hand tools to do so.</p><p></p><p>I don't think anyone involved acted out of ill will, lack of integrity or without honor. Bobby It does suck it forced you into a 3rd place position though! There should be some way for a racer impacted by another challenge to attest or challenge it further. If anything can be learned from this chain of events is how to improve things moving forward. Some of this was discussed after the CRB decision was delivered. I'm have faith that Big Rich will improve the processes and make it better especially since it sounded as if this was the first time a challenge was placed and CRB was utilized. My personal impression as stated above is Big Rich actively engages in gaining feedback, listening to our input and taking it into consideration as changes are made to better the experience for all racers involved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BMan, post: 285974, member: 732"] Rich Kudo's to you and how things were ran! It's refreshing to see how you worked with us, gained our input and feedback to improve things and involved racers when a challenge was made. My perception is you take the attitude that the racers make a series and not the other way around! Due to the rain I don't think turnout was as good as it could of been! I think the "sissy's" stayed at home! LOL! I bet the next race will be a better turn out! Oh and my apologize I don't think I ever offered you any of the home brew the wife makes. I'll make sure I do next time! :drinkers: ---------------------------- Bobby I was one of the 3 racers on the CRB along with another racer whose name escapes me right now and Roger King as you know since he came and talked to you as you were about to leave. The CRB was aware of what the placing changes would be before we started the process however we had no input or say in them or having them changed. I don't disagree with you on the statement both you and Jeff from Allsouth should have been given 2nd place. That wasn't are call though. We were to decide if under the circumstances what the racer did was warrant of a DQ or not. The Ultra 4 rules I reviewed are pretty black and white and it was stated at the driver meeting it was a no chase race. The racer was not recovered by his own crew. Complexity and gray area was introduced pertaining to the radio communication that took place. This communication lead the recovery team to believe not only pulling him off the track was OK but back to the pits was also OK. The CRB's impression was the radio miscommunication was the root cause of the misunderstanding and lead to the outcome. The recovery crew seeming to have an authoritative answer and also being the authoritative body at the scene of the issue acted accordingly. If the racer would of been advised differently he could have fixed his issue right there at the scene since it was any easy fix that took minimal hand tools to do so. I don't think anyone involved acted out of ill will, lack of integrity or without honor. Bobby It does suck it forced you into a 3rd place position though! There should be some way for a racer impacted by another challenge to attest or challenge it further. If anything can be learned from this chain of events is how to improve things moving forward. Some of this was discussed after the CRB decision was delivered. I'm have faith that Big Rich will improve the processes and make it better especially since it sounded as if this was the first time a challenge was placed and CRB was utilized. My personal impression as stated above is Big Rich actively engages in gaining feedback, listening to our input and taking it into consideration as changes are made to better the experience for all racers involved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
Coalmont TN OHV New Park info
Latest: DrankinInTheWoods
Yesterday at 10:53 AM
General Discussion
Official "Post your trail riding pics" Thread
Latest: ridered3
Yesterday at 10:22 AM
General Discussion
Trying to get it mostly right the first time: A 5.9 Magnum and 46RE swapped, Tummy Tucked Daily Driven Jeep TJ
Latest: ridered3
Yesterday at 10:08 AM
Tech & Fab
2.5 ton rockwell pattern wheels
Latest: semperfi1919
Wednesday at 7:38 PM
Wanted to Buy
T
For Sale
85-91 Ford Kingpin Dana 60 $2k
Latest: truck-oholic
Tuesday at 4:29 PM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
Trail Rides & Competitions
GAP - Dirt Riot Race Round 1 - February 23, 2013
Top