Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Calendar
Monthly
Weekly
Agenda
Archive
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support Hardline Crawlers :
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
Mary Jane
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="patooyee" data-source="post: 589580" data-attributes="member: 483"><p>I guess my post refers more to illicit drugs. I know the subject says MJ but people were starting to talk about drugs in general, as if we weren't just talking MJ anymore, which is where my statements were directed mainly.</p><p></p><p>And I didn't say free killing spree on users. I said relaxed requirements for the use of lethal force during self defense. As it stands now you have to go through a 50-point legal checklist before you can even think about showing a gun much less using it. And even if you do check off every box on that list and use it, your life is liable to be ruined from the ensuing legal suits anyway. You don't have to be wrong to get sued and driven into bankruptcy. I'm saying that checklist should be much shorter with the burden of proof being on the perp instead of the victim in the case of users. If you get killed while high, it should be your legal team's problem to prove why you should not have been killed before the self-defender is automatically driven bankrupt proving why he should be alive..</p><p></p><p>And yes, I think the same should apply for drinking as well. You get drunk, start fighting people, cause a danger to me or mine? You deserve to die. As it stands now, the system protects you over us. That isn't right and would only be perpetuated by legalizing illicit drugs.</p><p></p><p>Why is it fair that someone who knowingly, under their own free will, who relinquishes control of their own body to a substance, thereby doing something they would normally not in their right mind do and endangering normal, productive members of society gets more or even the same rights as their potential victims? Let's at least acknowledge that these people are not as useful as others, have self-de-valued themselves, and are not as valuable as those who lead responsible lives.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="patooyee, post: 589580, member: 483"] I guess my post refers more to illicit drugs. I know the subject says MJ but people were starting to talk about drugs in general, as if we weren't just talking MJ anymore, which is where my statements were directed mainly. And I didn't say free killing spree on users. I said relaxed requirements for the use of lethal force during self defense. As it stands now you have to go through a 50-point legal checklist before you can even think about showing a gun much less using it. And even if you do check off every box on that list and use it, your life is liable to be ruined from the ensuing legal suits anyway. You don't have to be wrong to get sued and driven into bankruptcy. I'm saying that checklist should be much shorter with the burden of proof being on the perp instead of the victim in the case of users. If you get killed while high, it should be your legal team's problem to prove why you should not have been killed before the self-defender is automatically driven bankrupt proving why he should be alive.. And yes, I think the same should apply for drinking as well. You get drunk, start fighting people, cause a danger to me or mine? You deserve to die. As it stands now, the system protects you over us. That isn't right and would only be perpetuated by legalizing illicit drugs. Why is it fair that someone who knowingly, under their own free will, who relinquishes control of their own body to a substance, thereby doing something they would normally not in their right mind do and endangering normal, productive members of society gets more or even the same rights as their potential victims? Let's at least acknowledge that these people are not as useful as others, have self-de-valued themselves, and are not as valuable as those who lead responsible lives. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Latest posts
Pickett State Park/Blackhouse Mountian 1-23-2016
Latest: ridered3
Yesterday at 3:12 PM
Trail Rides & Competitions
Daves Offroad Supply
Latest: Daves Offroad Supply
Wednesday at 10:52 AM
Vendors
B
For Sale
Artec Back-bone truss for 14 bolt
Latest: Bebop
Tuesday at 7:19 PM
Off Road 4x4 Parts For Sale
P
YouTube of the day
Latest: paradisepwoffrd
Monday at 8:21 AM
General Discussion
Cash LeCroy Illness
Latest: ridered3
Sunday at 2:58 PM
General Discussion
Forums
Rock Crawling Forums
General Discussion
Mary Jane
Top