Seatbelt ticket.

Hardline Crawlers - Rock Bouncer Builds, Tech & Off-Road Trail Talk

Help Support Hardline Crawlers:

Ty.

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
0
City & State/Province
under a bridge
Just got another no seatbelt ticket.:mad: I was just getting onto the 1st ave bridge heading S. to go up the Burien freeway.

The cop said, and I quote, "you have to have your seatbelt on before you enter the highway", (or freeway), I foget exactly.

Sooo, does that mean that you can drive around town without it on?
I'm pretty sure the law is for any road, not just freeways.
Maybe he was just tipping his cards for me, and letting me know that that is all they are enforcing.
 
Put it on before you put the vehicle in gear and you'll never get another ticket for failure to obey the law. Yes this comes from a guy that has gotten 3 tickets for such stupidity, the last was about 4 years ago.
 
I would trade that winch for a trunk monkey and when ever you don't put your seatbelt on--he punch's you :awesomework:
 
Seat belt law applies to any road...and has been in effect/enforced since the late 80's/early 90's....
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
My vote is for the seatbelt law to be abolished and anyone that is not wearing a seatbelt and is injured or injures someone in an accident shall not receive insurance to cover the damages. :awesomework:

:stirpot:
 
My vote is for the seatbelt law to be abolished and anyone that is not wearing a seatbelt and is injured or injures someone in an accident shall not receive insurance to cover the damages. :awesomework:

:stirpot:

Why abolish it??? Keep it in effect, and amend it to include loss of coverage if no belt is worn....:stirpot:
 
Why abolish it??? Keep it in effect, and amend it to include loss of coverage if no belt is worn....:stirpot:


Because that just reiterates it's nanny state effect. Get rid of required insurance and seatbelt laws. If you have insurance then you can go without a seatbelt, if you don't have insurance then you had better have that belt on because if you wreck the tax payers are on the hook for your injuries.
 
Because that just reiterates it's nanny state effect. Get rid of required insurance and seatbelt laws. If you have insurance then you can go without a seatbelt, if you don't have insurance then you had better have that belt on because if you wreck the tax payers are on the hook for your injuries.

Doh! Yeah, thanks fer the schooling...:haha:
 
My vote is for the seatbelt law to be abolished and anyone that is not wearing a seatbelt and is injured or injures someone in an accident shall not receive insurance to cover the damages. :awesomework:
You're kinda sorta on the right track, but what does your choice of personal safety equipment have to do with anyone else's safety?

Also, why should my insurance company decide whether or not to pay a claim based on anyone else's idea of correct safety equipment?

I vote abolish it, too. Bet you didn't see that coming :redneck:
 
Get rid of required insurance
TOTALLY different. You not carrying insurance may have a very direct and very real effect on someone else. The way our traffic laws are structured, forced liability insurance is pretty much the only logical conclusion.
 
Tint your windows for they can't see in as easy. I do where my belt when needed, but I also drive alot without it.

On the other side of things. I have seen where seat belts have saved lives, but also seen where if the person could have moved, they would be alive today

you got the choice. Buckle up or take the chance, your choice
 
Because that just reiterates it's nanny state effect. Get rid of required insurance and seatbelt laws. If you have insurance then you can go without a seatbelt, if you don't have insurance then you had better have that belt on because if you wreck the tax payers are on the hook for your injuries.
Do you REALLY want uninsured drivers to cause you personal injury and property damage? Who pays if they have no insurance?
 
Do you REALLY want uninsured drivers to cause you personal injury and property damage? Who pays if they have no insurance?



It costs me $2.50 a month for uninsured motorist insurance. Had an uninsured biotch pull out in front of me and I t boned her. When it was all said and done she paid me for my deductible and she paid the insurance company back.
 
Im only alive because of a seatbelt. I had purple makes everywhere it touched me. The rest of the rig I destroyed was so smashed that the only place a person would fit was right in the belted position. The roof was pushing the steering wheel down on to my seat and the headliner was pushed into my face/forehead.

I have no problem wearing a seatbelt regardless of the law.
 
Absolutely abolish the law. I wear my seatbelt anytime I'm on the road. If you've ever pushed a rope in windshield out with your head, you would too. :awesomework:
 
Im only alive because of a seatbelt. I had purple makes everywhere it touched me. The rest of the rig I destroyed was so smashed that the only place a person would fit was right in the belted position. The roof was pushing the steering wheel down on to my seat and the headliner was pushed into my face/forehead.

I have no problem wearing a seatbelt regardless of the law.

Amen!!!

But I still like the idea of the trunk monkey :D
 
I've never been in a seatbelt any time I've been hit including one head on, but I realize that in certain violent collisions they will save lives. Therefore I agree I should probably wear one. I like the trunk monkey idea, just not the nanny laws.
 
Im only alive because of a seatbelt. I had purple makes everywhere it touched me. The rest of the rig I destroyed was so smashed that the only place a person would fit was right in the belted position. The roof was pushing the steering wheel down on to my seat and the headliner was pushed into my face/forehead.

I have no problem wearing a seatbelt regardless of the law.

Holy crap Brad! Damn!! I agree with you though, I have no problem putting my belt on at all times. It is actually a habit for me. I don't even think about it. Heck , I even put it on when driving around a jobsite.....:haha: I catch myself doing that though, and quickly remove it.:redneck:
 
Holy crap Brad! Damn!! I agree with you though, I have no problem putting my belt on at all times. It is actually a habit for me. I don't even think about it. Heck , I even put it on when driving around a jobsite.....:haha: I catch myself doing that though, and quickly remove it.:redneck:

The problem is, is it has never been a habbit for me. I never wore one (unless wheelin'), even as a kid. I remember being on a trip to Texas as a kid, and my sister kept harping on
me to put my seatbelt on, so I finally gave in and wrapped it around my neck and buckled it.
 
The problem is, is it has never been a habbit for me. I never wore one (unless wheelin'), even as a kid. I remember being on a trip to Texas as a kid, and my sister kept harping on
me to put my seatbelt on, so I finally gave in and wrapped it around my neck and buckled it.

Oh well that makes all the difference! You should have told the officer wearing a seat belt had never been a habit, he surely would have stopped writing the citation and called Olympia at once to have them erase the previous citations for the same. :awesomework:
 
Seatbelt laws and helmet laws are complete bull****, just another law purchased by lobbyists to make their employers more money.
 
What I hate is the tickets I got when I WAS wearing my belt! If I get pulled over now, before they tell me what I'm being written up for, I let them know prior to any conversation that the incident has been recorded and transmitted to a safe location as I point to the decal on my window that states the same. (I usually preserve that to trips south. I haven't been hassled by many locals. Wish I'd had it running in my truck the day before my mom died)
 
Back
Top