mark
Well-Known Member
Someone refresh my [failing] memory on what really makes and Atlas worth the extra $$ over a "Build" D300. I've got it in my mind that the Atlas is "better", since all the cool kids run or want to run them, but I can't remember how much of that is Internet propaganda vs real fact.
I've been piecing together all the parts for a D300 that would have similar specs to an Atlas (32-splines, 4:1's etc), but in some of the latest number crunching of what I have left... I'm over 1/2 way to a used Atlas (which there seems to be more of), so now I'm reconsidering the D300 and steping up to the "bling". But is it just to have all the cool part vs practical?
The answer should be obvious, but much like Crashypoo just said in another thread, getting old sucks and I can't remember all the pro's and cons.
I've been piecing together all the parts for a D300 that would have similar specs to an Atlas (32-splines, 4:1's etc), but in some of the latest number crunching of what I have left... I'm over 1/2 way to a used Atlas (which there seems to be more of), so now I'm reconsidering the D300 and steping up to the "bling". But is it just to have all the cool part vs practical?
The answer should be obvious, but much like Crashypoo just said in another thread, getting old sucks and I can't remember all the pro's and cons.