Fox 2.0 coilover advice

[Pineygroveoffroad]

I'm fixing to buy a set of 16" Fox 2.0 emulsion coilovers. My question is what's the benefit of the remote reservoir vs non? Any advice would be greatly appreciated

 

[al1tonyota]

The remote resi hold more oil to keep the shocks cooler unless you are endurance racing emulations are all you need!

 

[Pineygroveoffroad]

10-4 thank ya sir

 

[John Galbreath Jr.]

Packaging much easier without also, never seen a hot shock with what we do. Racing or desert, well or course.

 

[wizzo]

IMO, I would go with a remote resi coil over unless you just do not have the room for a reservoir. Fox reservoirs are pretty small.

Here is some more info: http://accutuneoffroad.com/articles/the-difference-between-emulsion-remote-reservoir-shocks

 

[mobil1syn]

remote reservoir allows for a more consistent performing shock.

emulsion turn into the head of a beer almost instantaneously.

 

[Pineygroveoffroad]

Thanks for the info

 

[mac5005]

Re:

Yes remote reservoir are better, but

If you aren't racing, I doubt you will exceed the performance capacity of an emulsion.

One thing not mentioned yet is that emulsions are quicker to rebuild and tune than a reservoir shock.

You will get more bang for your buck out of either by having them tuned just for you and your rig.


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk