Money Mark
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 563
With just the drivers intoxication level; in your own personal opinion which one does more damage to the trails?
With just the drivers intoxication level; in your own personal opinion which one does more damage to the trails?
I vote Sober offroad clubs, bigger impact over time
the sober ones in organized groups of 5+ rigs has to have a bigger impact over time than the drunks. How many trails do drunken partiers cover in a given day vs the hard core jeep groups who tour the whole park?
I vote Sober offroad clubs, bigger impact over time
If you weighted the damage to existing and rogue trail driving by;
ALL intoxicated drivers in your right hand,
ALL other drivers in your left hand,
You could give yourself "the stranger".
If you compare to a 1:1 ratio then there is no way a sober person will do less damage.
Data to prove this statement?
Common sense might tell an individual one thing, but even then "intoxicated drivers are bad" is just an accusation, stemmed from (lack of) social acceptance.
We're talking about comparing an intoxicated vs. sober driver causing actual and real quantifiable and proved resource damage to existing trails system's.....not morals or ethics.
Morals and Ethics.....our minds have been made up for us, by The Man.
If you are looking for any kind of stats/data--your not going to find any as there are none out there that I have seen---just what I have seen since I got my first rig in 91'.
I have a test we can do that will answer this. At the core event the tamers have there obstacle course. We can line it with strreamers to signafy a trail corridor. We will get you intoxicated and let you run the course and I will run the course. Who do you think will do more damage?
Logical thinking.:awesomework:
The only way to get any valid data is to compare the same driver, same rig over the same course and same conditions. Anything else is speculative BS. And even then you would get different results from different drivers.
Any other comparisons (I.E. like Darby's) could be viewed as an attempt to justify drinking on the trail.
Darby- Since we're on the subject...How many drunk driving accidents have you responded to being a firefighter/medic and how many of those could have been prevented if the driver was not intoxicated...
I really can't believe we still have people who think it's perfectly ok to drink or be drunk on the trails and are still debating it.
you and crash suggesting this be done like a competition is only going to compare one thing.
A drunks driving skills to a sober persons skills. Hell a good drunk toyota driver will shame a sober cherokee driver.
The tru debate here is
Intentions