one thing i still dont understand is this rock garden thing. Sounds fun for 5 minutes then what? I would play on it if it was there but for how long before I moved to the busy wild with everyone else. They wanted to take some pressure off that trail but how much would a 100yds of rock really do. Why not spend the money and resources on developing new trails that you could spend several hours on? and actually releave pressure from BW.?
and I did hear no width restrictions last night (as of yet) but it seems a certain person on here is trying to still push them not sure why?
:corn:
I totally agree with you on this subject, why......... WHY spend money or waste volunteered man hours on building or making another "NEW" trail, when we CURRENTLY have trails that need the work or corrective measures put in place to solve these type of meetings. alot of direct questions were avoided.
we were there, we woulod of stayed until over-night to solve it, now i heard another member on here say; the next meeting most likely will not have this amount of turn out and then the decisions will be made, *(might be right!) I think alot of people there last night were on the same page though. maybe we'll all just keep showing up in #'s like lastnight at future meetings.
It was a positive impact, even if the director stated;
"maybe only 40 people will show up next time!" and we can divide up into 4 groups?
huh......... how bout maybe another 400 people will show up, and you listen to us right then and there. i didn't like the avoidence of questions, and that statement of less people showing up next time, this concerns us all. and next time, bring a P.A. system so we can all here the speaker and guests talk.
ok, off my step now.:beer:
good turn out and hope to SEE it again at the next meeting.