Reiter 6/20/09

crash2 · Jun 22, 2009

HOrunner said:
How would one know which trails are "one of those trails":eeek:

Trails that were mapped for the orv commitie I believe is how they are doing it.

Mark m. · Jun 22, 2009

Money Mark said:
This looks steep.

Where is that?

S.E. corner of the rock garden.

phew · Jun 22, 2009

Mark m. said:
S.E. corner of the rock garden.

:haha:

chevota1 · Jun 22, 2009

crash said:
AA---one of those trails you can get ticketed on...

were not allowed on aa either?

crash2 · Jun 22, 2009

chevota said:
were not allowed on aa either?

From my understanding--any trails that were in the inventory when the commitie finished are deemed "not legal trails"--granted none up there are as we all know it. But for enforcement reasons I think thats what they are going to use. But I am not 100% but pretty certain thats how its going to work..

zukkev · Jun 22, 2009

crash said:
From my understanding--any trails that were in the inventory when the commitie finished are deemed "not legal trails"--granted none up there are as we all know it. But for enforcement reasons I think thats what they are going to use. But I am not 100% but pretty certain thats how its going to work..

Sooo, any trail NOT in their map system would be deemed legal???:corn:

Mark m. · Jun 22, 2009

Aren't all the trails not legal except the two they closed. The wall and Izzy.

Cascade_Crawler · Jun 22, 2009

I saw Mr Whitehall parked at the entrance to tightass/aa hill access road...:eeek:

jeepmauler · Jun 22, 2009

Time for some new trails

Not Jobless · Jun 22, 2009

Cascade_Crawler said:
I saw Mr Whitehall parked at the entrance to tightass/aa hill access road...:eeek:

Who?

Rhino1 · Jun 22, 2009

The local Law enforcement. Nice guy. I met him at a meeting a few months ago.

crash2 · Jun 22, 2009

Mark m. said:
Aren't all the trails not legal except the two they closed. The wall and Izzy.

Yes--all of them are. But using some logical thinking---when the process of the ORV stuff was going on--they had to invetory all the known trails which they did. So to them anything not in that invetory is deemed a true ilegal trail. But that being said all those are ilegal but yet on there records. Sounds odd but to me that is hbow they would enforce it and known the 2 DNR officers (ron, gary) thats how they would enforce it.

I may be wrong but makes sense to me.

zukkev · Jun 22, 2009

Rhino said:
The local Law enforcement. Nice guy. I met him at a meeting a few months ago.

Actually is a really nice guy (met him first up on Sumas, then again at Walker during a search), and easy to talk to...He gets the frustration we go through...Yet, he has a job to do, which he goes above and beyond when it comes to the Education and Enforcement end of things....

phew · Jun 23, 2009

so what we only have like five "legal" trails now

Money Mark · Jun 23, 2009

phew said:
so what we only have like five "legal" trails now

Eleven.

Not Jobless · Jun 23, 2009

twelve, you forgot the muddy trail that runs up your crack :haha::fawkdancesmiley:

Mark m. · Jun 23, 2009

Jackazz said:
twelve, you forgot the muddy trail that runs up your crack :haha::fawkdancesmiley:

You need stickys for that trail

beatDR · Jun 23, 2009

I'm confused did they block them off or just put up a sign and give you a ticket? And dose anyone have a link to the map I can't find it

Mark m. · Jun 23, 2009

beatDR said:
I'm confused did they block them off or just put up a sign and give you a ticket? And dose anyone have a link to the map I can't find it

Both

ROKRIG · Jun 23, 2009

Shouldn't they have found another way to mount the sign to trees besides nails? I thought all this was intended to protect the wildnerness. Poor tree.