jmf said:I've been using a tsc ram as well for years. It works ok. Just wanted to see if it would be worth it going to a double ended ram.
wizzo said:for crawling, it really doesn't matter. go fast you would want double ended. If you have the room, go double ended. If packaging is an issue, single.
my best suggestion is buy at least the orbital and ram from PSC, Howe, who ever. Unless you know a good amount about matching orbital with ram. There are also other options out there for pumps besides PSC, do a little research.
CHASMAN9 said:Depending on the size tire you run, double ended is the only way to go in my opinion. It is a push/push type of situation rather than push one direction and pull it all the way back the other way. I recently changed mine from the single to the double and notice a huge improvement in quicker turning response.
ADMINISTRATOR
jeeptj99 said:and you still can't miss the one tree on the course......
CHASMAN9 said:Depending on the size tire you run, double ended is the only way to go in my opinion. It is a push/push type of situation rather than push one direction and pull it all the way back the other way. I recently changed mine from the single to the double and notice a huge improvement in quicker turning response.
ADMINISTRATOR
TBItoy said:I've actually found that double ended was easier to package. That's why all my shitty Toyotas ended up with double ended rams... but the axle was always occupying the same space as the frame/harmonic balancer/radiator.
Having a stationary object mounted in close to the axle with only the little tie rods swinging was much easier to fit in tight space around the frame/engine, than a big swinging tie rod with a ram piggy-backed on it somewhere.
Plus DE drive better, and is easier to protect (since you have to mount the ram anyway, just make it an axle bumper/skid)