30th6
Well-Known Member
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
30th6 said:I couldn't do a big bearing like in the pics.i don't have enough room.
thats what I wanted to do but wouldn't fit between frame and trans.
I may try and put another bearing on this setup if it dont work out.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
bjeep said:http://www.hardlinecrawlers.com/forums/index.php?topic=24435.0
Make something like this if space is a problem...
Or buy one from them.
30th6 said:its a bearing.it's on a samurai with a 4.3,not a bouncer it will never see high speed
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
30th6 said:ok.
whats the difference between this and a stock two peice drive shaft?
they both have a bearing between two drive shafts.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
30th6 said:its only gonna have three joints.
tcase... after bearing... axel
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
yes the pic is the left half of the two peice you got posted waiting on my flange to finish the right side(after the bearing)patooyee said:So then one of those yokes in your pic attaches directly to either your t-case or your axle?
This is a 3-piece shaft, what I think you are unwittingly designing. Notice the two bearings as far apart as possible on the middle shaft and 4 joints:
Here's a true 2-piece, noting only one bearing needed as a result of only having 3 joints:
Am I misunderstanding your design intent?
yes .the bearing wil be very close to the outer yoke just like the above pic.d_daffron said:Looking at that picture, does the yoke on the left with the joint in it bolt directly to the transfer case, like the only U joint in that picture goes directly into the transfer case yoke? If it does, your shaft will work, although i'd try to move the bearing as close to the yoke on the right (the one without a Joint in it in the picture) as possible to reduce side loading on the bearing. These guys are thinking that this shaft is solid mounted to the skidplate with a short driveshaft bolted between it and the transfer case.