Personally, I agree with that. I know some people don't but *I* feel that if all (or atleast most-all) 'difficult' obstacles had an alternative route, the trails would likely be less torn up that they are now. If you can't make it, go around rather than tear it up trying, or even winching some obstacles you can tear things up (wheel spin). Or widening the trail to 'turn around' as people like to tell others to do. Or if you have a broken rig or whatever. An 'easy' route with less impact since there is such a huge variety of vehicles and skill levels (and brain cells) out there to preserve the more difficult lines yet still let folks travel as a group.
totally disagree!! The ratio of easy/moderate/hard trails to "very hard/extreme" trails is 100:1? who knows? I see peole running the bypasses on sack-up that would be better suited to run lake Isabell.Look at Rhino land....ruined by bypass around bypass around bypass etc.because stockish rigs get so far BECAUSE of bypasses and then make more to continue.....never ends.Had they stayed on a trail suited to their rig,NOT EGO, everyone in the trail system benefits.OM was built(to me anyway) as a sanctuary of FROM the bypass mentality and running into stockers WAY IN OVER THEIR HEAD.
If your in a parking lot--and its empty--do you follow the rows or shoot straight for a parking spot close to the store?
Really whats the difference? If you build a trail--and creat "controlled" bypass's you can control the amount of damage.
Myself I prefer to keep a trail with one single route--but that requires education to users--and usually people would rather bitch about noobs than really do anything to teach them right--hell even once in a while I just drive past those people (because some times I need a break too)..